Too many new papers? Record screening decisions

Give a text AI paper abstracts, IDs and screening criteria to draft a deduplicated reading-candidate log for human review. This is a drafting exercise; the source used Codex.

Execution environment and usage

AI / software

General text chat (example: Claude)

Where to operate

A general text-AI conversation; for example, a new chat on the Claude website where available. This is a text exercise, not an agent run.

Getting started

  1. Open an authorized text-chat tool; Claude’s web entry is claude.ai.
  2. Paste the relevant text from paper abstracts, IDs and screening criteria and the prompt below; request a deduplicated reading-candidate log.

Setup and plan requirements

Prepare shareable, de-identified paper abstracts, IDs and screening criteria; paste only relevant excerpts. An available chat account and allowance are needed; Claude also has location and age requirements. This exercise needs no connector or execution permission from the original source workflow. The chat can produce the text draft. Any later checks of actual files, screens, audio or test results require a person, suitable software and existing outputs. Mark checks unverified when those outputs are absent.

Prompt portability limits

Questions and supplied text can be adapted to another capable chat tool. This produces a draft, not file access, code execution, account connections or the original operational outcome.

Usage limitations

The source reports Codex. This page adapts it into a deduplicated reading-candidate log, not a completed automated workflow in that product. Follow the checks below; source outcomes do not establish this exercise’s results.

Environment sources

適用情境 / When to use

Give a text AI paper abstracts, IDs and screening criteria to draft a deduplicated reading-candidate log for human review. This is a drafting exercise; the source used Codex. Jonas Wiedermann-Möller reports using Codex for recurring arXiv searches, CSV deduplication and a Zotero reading queue.

步驟 / Steps

  1. Prepare a research question, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date range and existing paper IDs.
  2. Test a single pass with public metadata and abstracts, distinguishing new papers, versions and previously seen items.
  3. Audit exclusions and their reasons; missing full text cannot establish weak methods or invalid findings.

提示詞 / Prompt

Screen [arXiv results] against [question, inclusion/exclusion criteria and date range], deduplicating against [seen IDs and versions]. Give titles, IDs, versions, sources, reasons and uncertainties. Do not judge methodological quality from abstracts alone. Draft a reading queue without deleting references or scheduling future runs.

留意事項 / Cautions

  • Preprints are not necessarily peer reviewed.
  • Review one run before separately deciding on recurring execution.

來源限制 / Evidence limits

The author retains research judgment and provides no missed-paper evaluation; screening cannot replace reading.

流程說明 / Workflow note

These steps and prompts are original, untested exercises by this site, not the author’s verbatim workflow. Reported results do not guarantee exercise outcomes.

原始工具組合 / Original tool stack

Codex; arXiv; CSV history; Zotero

Source publication date: 2026-07-07

Source checked: 2026-10-19

How I Use Codex To Automate Parts Of My Research Workflow