Compare software versions with vulnerability notices

Provide a de-identified software inventory and public advisories. Preserve CVE identifiers, source links and original ratings in a review list.

Execution environment and usage

AI / software

ChatGPT Search (documented optional research surface)

Where to operate

Optional verified entry: Search within a ChatGPT conversation on web or official apps; retain the historical tool attribution.

Getting started

  1. Open a ChatGPT conversation, choose View all tools, then Search; alternatively type / and choose Search.
  2. Enter the published prompt with its allowed public sources and constraints; check software/version matches, CVE IDs and advisory sources.
  3. Open cited pages and verify wording, dates and unknown fields. Do not infer content from blocked pages.

Setup and plan requirements

ChatGPT Search available for the actual region/account/workspace and within usage limits; use only de-identified non-sensitive queries and authorized sources.

Prompt portability limits

A documented optional implementation of the already-published one-time read-only research exercise, not a compulsory replacement or reproduction of the historical automation.

Usage limitations

Historical stack: n8n + public vulnerability feeds + model analysis + notification integrations. Not hands-on tested. Check current version, plan, regional and integration permissions; a prompt does not configure the workflow.

Environment sources

適用情境 / When to use

Provide a de-identified software inventory and public advisories. Preserve CVE identifiers, source links and original ratings in a review list. This one-time adaptation of an n8n workflow does not scan systems, patch software or send alerts. Malika’s SOC-CERT project describes n8n-based vulnerability aggregation and notifications, with some interactive features still demonstrations.

步驟 / Steps

  1. Prepare a software-version inventory without host locations or secrets, plus public vulnerability notices.
  2. Match products, affected versions and CVE identifiers; separate source severity from AI judgments.
  3. Have a person verify exposure; failed sources and unknown versions must not mean no vulnerabilities.

提示詞 / Prompt

Compare [public notices] with [de-identified software and version inventory]. List potentially relevant CVEs, source links, original severity and version evidence. Separate unknowns and preserve official scores. Produce a local review list without scanning, patching or sending alerts.

留意事項 / Cautions

  • Do not scan unauthorized systems or run exploits.
  • AI scores do not replace official ratings or security review.

來源限制 / Evidence limits

This is a self-reported challenge entry; reliability and zero-cost claims are not guarantees.

流程說明 / Workflow note

These steps and prompts are original, untested exercises by this site, not the author’s verbatim workflow. Reported results do not guarantee exercise outcomes.

原始工具組合 / Original tool stack

n8n; Bright Data; Cohere Command-R; CISA KEV / OTX; Slack / Gmail / Google Sheets

Source publication date: 2025-08-27

Source checked: 2026-10-19

SOC-CERT: Automated Threat Intelligence System with n8n & AI